Incoming US Homeland Security Committee chair Peter King condemns PC, media terror apologetics, Muslims acquiesce-ignoring terror, conspiracy theories, double standards & treachery

From an opinion piece in New York's Newsday, U.S. Rep. Peter King wrote

NOTE: Words in square brackets [] are comments by the author of this blog article and not by Peter King.

To some in the strata of political correctness, I'm a pretty bad guy. To be blunt, this crowd sees me as an anti-Muslim bigot. A spokesman for the Committee on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) denounced me last year for making "bigoted remarks . . . about Muslims and mosques”

[Labeling criticism of Islamic and Muslim problems and hate as 'hate', e.g. 'bigoted'. Its a blasphemy to make such criticism.]

from moralistic condemnation to sorrowful rebuke [by Newsday]

[Moralizing trick. Unfounded moral outrage at any criticism of Islam or Muslims while ignoring far worse wrongs and atrocities by Muslims.]

barely a month after those [9-11] attacks that killed so many hundreds of Long Islanders, prominent Long Island Muslim leaders were insisting there was no evidence that al-Qaida was responsible for the attacks - even saying it could have been the CIA, the FBI or the Zionists!

[A bit of psychology: distorted Muslim views of the world, conspiracy theories, 'Muslims can do no wrong so someone else must be responsible such evils', blame the victim blame game and anti-Semitism. Important to note that this is not a tiny minority of Muslims that have these problems. It's mainstream with even Muslim leaders holding such distorted views.]

Even more troubling is that to this day, no Muslim leader has denounced those vile remarks. Nor did Newsday say a word about these slanders - no moral outrage or condemnation. No demand for an apology or even an explanation.

[Double standards: Muslim and media silence when Muslims make hate remarks but loud outrage at even legitimate criticism of Islam. See hate-labeling above.]

As I became more immersed in attempting to unravel the radical Islamic threat to our nation and our civilization, it became more and more obvious to me that the moral myopia of Long Island's Muslim leaders and their apologists in the media was the rule - and that there were few exceptions.

[Islamism is a global existential threat. Distorted views and political correctness are the rule among Muslims and the media.]

Federal and local law enforcement officials throughout the country told me they received little or - in most cases - no cooperation from Muslim leaders and imams.

[Indirect support for terrorism. They may not be terrorists but they do nothing about terrorism in their mist.]

In the past 15 months we saw Najibullah Zazi, who was raised and educated in Queens, attempt to attack the New York City subway system with liquid explosives, using skills he learned in terrorist training camps in Afghanistan. We learned about Zazi by chance when his name came up on a wiretap. The case was almost compromised when a Queens imam - ostensibly cooperating with the New York City Police Department - tipped off Zazi.

[Treachery: Taqiyya by a hate preacher Imam helping terrorists. Despite claims by leftists social determinists and some Muslims that poverty causes terrorism, Zazi here is a terrorists despite being in the US and getting an education. He wasn't living in poverty in some third world slum.]

a Pew Poll showed that 15 percent of Muslim Americans between 18 and 29 say suicide bombing is justified. I also know of imams instructing members of their mosques not to cooperate with law enforcement officials investigating the recruiting of young men in their mosques as suicide bombers.

[Sympathy for terror is substantial and not restricted to a tiny fringe minority. And these people aren't living in some poor and backward third world Islamic country. They are in the US. These imams must know something about Islam and so must know that 'Islam has nothing to do with terrorism'. Why is it then that they aren't preaching these messages or are helping fight these allegedly un-Islamic terrorists.]

leaders who - for whatever reason - acquiesce in terror or ignore the threat.

[As before, they may not be terrorists themselves but many Muslims, including leaders do noting about it either, and so are in effect condoning or indirectly supporting terror. This is a common problem that also exists in places like Qatar, Pakistan and even in Britain.]

[Caution: Peter King also said he isn't anti-Muslim. He points out that he supported Balkan Muslims including those in Bosnia, Macedonia and Kosovo against Serbian Christians [including Clinton's 1995 and 1998 military offensives], and supported Pakistan on Kashmir against India.]


Source: Newsday (New York) [Thought not referenced, see also the World Net Daily report on this story.]


Comments: The Albanian KLA that the US promoted was a terrorist organization and based on numerous concrete reports, some of their members allegedly killed Christian Serbs and their Albanian rivals to harvest their organs.

This is the norm with many Muslims. If their opponent is stronger than them, they provoke the opponent and play the victim card, even thought they are no different or far worse.

This should always be remembered whenever Muslims in position of weakness play victim card. They may be publicly playing victims while killing people and harvesting their organs or doing something similar.

Click on the tags to read about other stories of Muslim treachery, hate campaign against those telling the truth about Islam and Muslims, media bias and terror excuses.


Some previous similar or related stories:

US backed 'ex-terrorist' KLA allegedly killed and harvested organs of Serb civilians but nothing done - justice sacrificed for short-term stability [These KLA terrorists are who Peter King supported against the Christian Serbs. Look what happens and see what those allegedly pitiful oppressed Muslim victims do.]

WikiLeaked UK cable: Distorted Muslim view of life-world, blame game, double speak, 'moral equivalence' and, left-wing and media incite-excuse terrorism [Muslim delusions and media inciting and excusing terror.]

Ex-Guyana MP Abdul Kadir sentenced to life for JFK airport terror plot to kill thousands - spied for Iran, claims Islam forbid killing “innocent” people [Treachery.]

Finally some PROOF: German studies find religious and cultural roots to Muslim propensity to violence, PC excuses can't explain all – like so DUH!!! [Politically correct false taboos about Islam and Muslims exposed and refuted.]

Imam warned to be "different" when reporter visited hate mosque, says Ex-Muslim [Lying hate preaching Imam and (willingly) manipulated media]

For similar or related stories posted after this article (if any), copy the title of this article and paste it in the search box on top of the page and click search.

For even more similar or related stories, click on the 'Labels' below.

US backed 'ex-terrorist' KLA allegedly killed and harvested organs of Serb civilians but nothing done - justice sacrificed for short-term stability

The following are excerpts from a report by Council of Europe investigator Dick Marty titled “Inhuman treatment of people and illicit trafficking in human organs in Kosovo”.

Note: Emphasis added.

3. According to the information gathered by the Assembly and to the criminal investigations now under way, numerous concrete and convergent indications confirm that some Serbians and some Albanian Kosovars were held prisoner in secret places of detention under KLA control in northern Albania and were subjected to inhuman and degrading treatment, before ultimately disappearing.

4. Numerous indications seem to confirm that, during the period immediately after the end of the armed conflict, before international forces had really been able to take control of the region and re-establish a semblance of law and order, organs were removed from some prisoners at a clinic in Albanian territory, near Fushë-Krujë, to be taken abroad for transplantation.

5. This criminal activity, which developed with the benefit of the chaos prevailing in the region, at the initiative of certain KLA militia leaders linked to organised crime, has continued, albeit in other forms, until today, as demonstrated by an investigation being carried out by the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (EULEX) relating to the Medicus clinic in Pristina.

6. Although some concrete evidence of such trafficking already existed at the beginning of the decade, the international authorities in charge of the region did not consider it necessary to conduct a detailed examination of these circumstances, or did so incompletely and superficially.

8. The ICTY, which had started to conduct an initial examination on the spot to establish the existence of traces of possible organ trafficking, dropped the investigation. The elements of proof taken in Rripe, in Albania, have been destroyed and cannot therefore be used for more detailed analyses. No subsequent investigation has been carried out into a case nevertheless considered sufficiently serious by the former ICTY Prosecutor for her to see the need to bring it to public attention through her book.

9. During the decisive phase of the armed conflict, NATO took action in the form of air strikes, while land operations were conducted by the KLA, de facto allies of the international forces. Following the departure of the Serbian authorities, the international bodies responsible for security in Kosovo very much relied on the political forces in power in Kosovo, most of them former KLA leaders.

10.The international organisations in place in Kosovo favoured a pragmatic political approach, taking the view that they needed to promote short-term stability at any price, thereby sacrificing some important principles of justice. For a long time little was done to follow-up evidence implicating KLA members in crimes against the Serbian population and against certain Albanian Kosovars. Immediately after the conflict ended, in effect, when the KLA had virtually exclusive control on the ground, many scores were settled between different factions and against those considered, without any kind of trial, to be traitors because they were suspected of having collaborated with the Serbian authorities previously in place.

11. EULEX, which took over certain functions in the justice sector previously fulfilled by UN structures (UNMIK) at the end of 2008, inherited a difficult and sensitive situation, particularly in the sphere of combating serious crime: incomplete records, lost documents, uncollected witness testimony. Consequently, a large number of crimes may well continue to go unpunished. Little or no detailed investigation has been carried out into organised crime and its connections with representatives of political institutions, or in respect of war crimes committed against Serbians and Albanian Kosovars regarded as collaborators or as rivals of the dominant factions. This last-named subject is still truly taboo in Kosovo today, although everybody talks about it in private, very cautiously. EULEX seems very recently to have made some progress in this field, and it is very much to be hoped that political considerations will not impede this commitment.

12. The team of international prosecutors and investigators within EULEX which is responsible for investigating allegations of inhuman treatment, including those relating to possible organ trafficking, has made progress, particularly in respect of proving the existence of secret KLA places of detention in northern Albania where inhuman treatment and even murders are said to have been committed. The investigation does not, however, benefit from the desirable co-operation from the Albanian authorities.

13. The appalling crimes committed by Serbian forces, which stirred up very strong feelings worldwide, gave rise to a mood reflected as well in the attitude of certain international agencies, according to which it was invariably one side that were regarded as the perpetrators of crimes and the other side as the victims, thus necessarily innocent. The reality is less clear-cut and more complex.

15. There cannot and must not be one justice for the winners and another for the losers. Whenever a conflict has occurred, all criminals must be prosecuted and held responsible for their illegal acts, whichever side they belonged to and irrespective of the political role they took on.

19.5.3 to start a serious and independent investigation in order to find out the whole truth about the allegations, sometimes concrete and specific, of the existence of secret detention centres where inhuman treatment was purportedly inflicted on prisoners from Kosovo, of Serbian or Albanian origin, during and immediately after the conflict; the investigation must also be extended to a verification of the equally specific allegations about organ trafficking said to have taken place during the same period, some of it on Albanian territory;

20. A further investigation, also carried out by EULEX, into the case of the Medicus Clinic in Pristina, has been made similarly difficult by the delays on the part of the authorities of several Council of Europe member and observer countries in responding to EULEX requests for international legal assistance[12]. Considering the gravity of the acts alleged – trafficking in human organs, no less – such delays are incomprehensible and unconscionable.

31. The evidence we have uncovered is perhaps most significant in that it often contradicts the much-touted image of the Kosovo Liberation Army, or KLA, as a guerrilla army that fought valiantly to defend the right of its people to inhabit the territory of Kosovo.

57. This group of prominent KLA personalities styled itself as the “Drenica Group”, evoking connections with the Drenica Valley in Kosovo[20], a traditional heartland of ethnic Albanian resistance to Serb oppression under Milosevic, and the birthplace of the KLA.

37. For more than two years after its initial emergence in 1996, the KLA was regarded as a marginal, loosely organised insurgency, whose attacks on the Yugoslav state were held by Western observers to amount to acts of “terrorism”.

43. Indeed, the perception of KLA pre‑eminence – largely created by the Americans – was a self-fulfilling prophecy, the bedrock upon which the KLA achieved actual ascendancy over other Kosovar Albanian constituencies with designs on power, such as Ibrahim Rugova’s Democratic League of Kosovo (LDK) and Bujar Bukoshi’s “Government-in-exile”.

44. According to our insider sources, the KLA fought just as hard, and devoted arguably more of its resources and political capital, to maintain its advantage over its ethnic Albanian rival factions as it did to carry out co-ordinated military actions against the Serbs.

161. At the latest when their blood was drawn by syringe for testing (a step that appears to have been akin to “tissue typing”, or determining levels of organ transplantation compatibility), or when they were physically examined by men referred to as “doctors”, the captives must have been put on notice that they were being treated as some form of medical commodities. Sources described such tests and examinations having been undertaken in both Rripe and Fushë-Krujë.

162. The testimonies on which we based our findings spoke credibly and consistently of a methodology by which all of the captives were killed, usually by a gunshot to the head, before being operated on to remove one or more of their organs. We learned that this was principally a trade in “cadaver kidneys”, i.e. the kidneys were extracted posthumously; it was not a set of advanced surgical procedures requiring controlled clinical conditions and, for example, the extensive use of anaesthetic.

164. The practical dimension of the trafficking enterprise was relatively simple. Captives brought as far as the Fushë-Krujë area (which entailed an arduous drive of several hours onwards from Rripe or Burrel) were first held in the “safe house” facility. The proprietor of this property was an ethnic Albanian who allegedly shared both clan ties and organised criminal connections with members of the “Drenica Group”.[42]

165. As and when the transplant surgeons were confirmed to be in position and ready to operate, the captives were brought out of the “safe house” individually, summarily executed by a KLA gunman, and their corpses transported swiftly to the operating clinic.


Source: Council of Europe (Web site)


Comments: Naive sympathy, bias and COVER-UP! (Sadly, nothing new or surprising however.)

Everyone should be very scared of the politically correct elites, authorities, officials and organizations that will overlook these types of macabre crime committed by Muslims.

The following quotes basically sums up the whole problem in the West.

The international organisations in place in Kosovo favoured a pragmatic political approach, taking the view that they needed to promote short-term stability at any price, thereby sacrificing some important principles of justice.[They will sacrifice you and justice]

international authorities in charge of the region did not consider it necessary to conduct a detailed examination of these circumstances, or did so incompletely and superficially. [Cover-ups, white washes and token investigations]

attitude of certain international agencies, according to which it was invariably one side that were regarded as the perpetrators of crimes and the other side as the victims, thus necessarily innocent. The reality is less clear-cut and more complex. [Misguided sympathy and bias favoring Muslims]

still truly taboo [...] today, although everybody talks about it in private, very cautiously. [Its a taboo ('hate' or 'Islamophobia') to talk about Islamic and Muslim problems, even grim and grizzly ones.]

Next time you might be the victim whose case the authorities try to cover-up, dismiss, down play or improperly investigate for 'short-term pragmatic' considerations or misguided sympathy. They might even go so far as to blame you for it.

Like in Kosovo, these people think that criticizing extremist Islam and Muslims is 'hate' and 'Islamophobia' and view all Muslims (whether guilty or not) as victims and have misguided and unjust sympathy only for them.

In the last few days, two cover-ups have been brought to light (on this site which only monitors a tiny fraction of all the cases out there); that of Muslim men raping white girls in northern England, Brazil covering-up terrorist threats in the country.

There was also the case of UK 'anti-terror' police John Larkin who criticized protests against Islamic extremism but did not speak out against the Islamists or their leftist allies for the problems they too cause. (Does he buys into the 'All Muslims are always victims' view?)

A reminder once again that Kosovo once used to be the center of a Christian Serbian civilization before being invaded and conquered by Muslim Ottoman Turks in the Middle ages and enduring centuries of Muslim rule.

The overwhelming majority of people in Kosovo today are Albanian Muslims and they have declared independence from Serbia. Their independence is recognized by many European countries and the U.S.


Some previous similar or related stories:

Kosovo national, Ilir Rrecaj, accused of involvement in killing Serbs to harvest human organs, indicted by EU for unrelated human kidney trafficking [Organ harvesting in Kosovo]

ISLAMIC TERROR 101: A case study in race-card, victim-card, blaming victims & isolated explanations, using UK 'anti-terror' police John Larkin [Muslim sympathetic official?]

Problem of Asian (MUSLIM PAKISTANI?) gangs luring and sexually abusing young White girls in Northern England but PC authorities won't admit [Cover-up]

COVER-UP: Brazil denies terrorism threat as it is “extremely sensitive” towards Muslim community in the country – WikiLeaks US embassy cables [Cover-up]

Genocide in Darfur continuing with “silent” rape and fear says UN prosecutor Ocampo – 300,000 dead and 2.7 million displaced in seven years

For similar or related stories posted after this article (if any), copy the title of this article and paste it in the search box on top of the page and click search.

For even more similar or related stories, click on the 'Labels' below.

WkikLeaks: US and Karzai say UK 'not up to the task' in Afghanistan and ‘made a mess of things’ according to ‘dismayed’ U.S. General Dan McNeil

Daily Mail reports that,

President Hamid Karzai contemptuously dismissed UK forces as ‘not up to the task’ of securing the Taliban stronghold [of Helmand province], cables released by WikiLeaks have revealed.

And U.S. General Dan McNeil, who led Nato forces in the war zone in 2007-08, claimed to be ‘dismayed’ that Britain had ‘made a mess of things’.

Ian Sadler, of Exmouth, Devon, who lost his son, Trooper Jack Sadler, 21, when his Land Rover hit a mine near Sangin in 2007 said:

‘We weren’t up to doing the job. The soldiers were, but they didn’t have the support of the Government, and they still don’t have the full support.’

Hillary has made an apology for those comments.

Source: Daily Mail (UK)


Comment: Can we trust Hillary's apology? We will have to wait until the next leaks to find out but judging from what was revealed in the current leaks, she probably was just being 'diplomatic'.

Here is a previous comment regarding the British

This is symptomatic, especially of the British among the rest of the wishful thinkers, who in their immature and childish psychology, naively and arrogantly think that being 'nice' will solve everything. (There were reports that British troops were replaced by the Americans in Musa Qala, Helmand province, Afghanistan, after their be 'nice' approach didn't work, with Marine commander Lt. Col. Michael Manning saying, "They didn't pursue the Taliban," "We'll go after them." There were also earlier claims by US General Jack Keane and Col Peter Mansoor that the Brits left in disgrace and defeat from souther Iraq after a similar approach failed and handed the place over to Islamic extremists and as a result, among other things, '45 women were killed by the militia for "un-Islamic" behaviour'. So being nice to terrorists is not nice to their victims. The French intelligence even claimed their own capital has been taken over by the Islamists and called it 'Londonistan'. The British are only hard on other British and non-British who speaks out against Islamic extremism as the recent example of 'anti-terror' police John Larkin shows.)


Some previous similar or related stories:

UK's MI6 'intelligence' conned by impostor claiming to be Taliban's Mullah Mansour – “naive” Westerners “excited so quickly” about peace talks

Problem of Asian (MUSLIM PAKISTANI?) gangs luring and sexually abusing young White girls in Northern England but PC authorities won't admit

Obama and anti-war defeatists blamed for emboldening terrorists in Afghanistan where minorities want US to stay

For similar or related stories posted after this article, copy the title of this article and paste it in the search box on top of the page and click search.

For even more similar or related stories, click on the 'Labels' below.

COVER-UP: Brazil denies terrorism threat as it is “extremely sensitive” towards Muslim community in the country – WikiLeaks US embassy cables

In January 2008 cables, the U.S. Ambassador at that time, Clifford Sobel said that Brazilians were

aware of the potential threat from terrorists exploiting the favorable conditions existing in Brazil [and were working against threats]

But according to the Associated Press, he added that

officials at the highest levels of the Brazilian government "are extremely sensitive" to any public claims that terrorists have a presence in Brazil and "will vigorously reject" such claims.

This sensitivity was due to fear of stigmatizing the country's Muslims community, concern for the tourist industry and to not bee seen as too close to the US' 'overly aggressive War on Terrorism'.

In one cable Sobel said, the Brazilians have

"arrested various individuals engaged in suspected terrorism financing activity but have based their arrests on narcotics and customs charges."

There has been allegations in the past that terrorists or their financiers were operating in the so-called Triple Border region between Brazil, Paraguay and Argentina.


Source: AP


Comment: Yet another hypersensitivity and cover-up case by the politically correct elites and (PC) censors, who only allow positive things to be said about Islam and Muslims, and label any criticism, even when legitimate, as 'hate' and 'Islamophobia'.

Here is what a Muslims said in another leaked cable,

'King Abdullah who called President Asif Ali Zardari the greatest obstacle to progress, adding: “When the head is rotten, it affects the whole body.”

Now the Saudi king maybe right or maybe he was being sectarian since Zardari is a Shiite, but it is true however that when the head is rotten, it does effect the whole body. The leaks here show that the elite heads in Brazil, as in almost everywhere else, is rotten.

The alarming thing to note here yet again is the fact that authorities are covering up the danger and are thereby endangering the public. They are putting political correctness before innocent lives.

They would covering-up any negative information about Islam and Muslims but publicize even the slightest of wrongs or alleged wrongs suffered by Muslims and feed this false victim psychology among Muslims that further encourages more terrorism.

Unless Muslims are told in no uncertain terms that there is a problem in their communities and they accept this fact and work against it, the problem of terrorism will continue.

Telling them that they are good and nice will only give them a false sense of being right and make them think terrorism is a justified and that they, perversely, are the victims. 


Some past similar or related stories:

Problem of Asian (MUSLIM PAKISTANI?) gangs luring and sexually abusing young White girls in Northern England but PC authorities won't admit [Another recent cover-up story] 

Iran's “barbaric” plan to execute Ashtiani, who was sentenced to death by stoning for adultery, condemned internationally [Brazilian president-elect Dilma Rousseff also said it would be a "barbarous act."]

Hugo Chavez and Iran in an Unholy alliance [South American Left-wing and Islamist Axis] 

Bolivia's Morales defiant against the US over its ties to the Iranians who have just been told to leave by their former Gambian allies [South American Left-wing and Islamist Axis]  

For similar or related stories posted after this article, copy the title of this article and paste it in the search box on top of the page and click search.

For even more similar or related stories, click on the 'Labels' below.

Problem of Asian (MUSLIM PAKISTANI?) gangs luring and sexually abusing young White girls in Northern England but PC authorities won't admit

Nine men – all Asians (probably all Pakistanis) – except one, in Derby, England, have been jailed for sexual offenses against 27 girls,¹ aged between 12-18,² of which 22 were White.¹

Two of those jailed, Abid Saddique and Mohammed Liaqat, both 28, were 'married with young children, were considered clean, upstanding family men as well as devout Muslims.'²

Since the start of the court case, these two 'had grown long beards and now wear Islamic dress'.²

The conviction of this gang came as a result of Operation Retriever, an undercover investigation by Derbyshire Police.²

It is believed that up to 100 girls may have been abused.¹

The gang dressed smartly and roamed the streets in a BMW to lured and groom girls before turning them into sex slaves and raping or abusing them over weeks or months.¹

The victims were held in contempt and called ‘gori’, meaning ‘white-skinned female’ in Urdu, instead of by their name.¹

A female Asian social worker explained that British Pakistani men often think white girls have lower morals than Muslims girls and believe that those who dress revealing “deserve what they get”.¹

This case follows two other recent cases; the jailing of five Asian men earlier this month and nine Asian weeks before that for similar sexual offences.¹

According to Daily Mail

It is a subject that in politically correct modern Britain is almost taboo — rarely spoken about by the police, the courts or even the agencies that counsel the girls afterwards.¹

The simple fact is that the perpetrators are almost all Asian and from the north of England — and their victims white.¹

The BBC radio reports on the case barely mentioned race and even the local city newspaper failed to use the word Asian.¹

The few who have spoken out against this “deafening silence” includes 'former MP Ann Cryer (criticised seven years ago when she said Asian gangs were raping white girls)' , Mohammed Shafiq, director of a charity promoting inter-community harmony, and Shokat Lal, chairman of Derby's Pakistani Community Centre in the Normanton area where most of the crimes took place.¹

Shafiq has said

‘I think the police are overcautious because they are afraid of being branded racist.¹

Shokat Lal also spoke out saying

‘It is important that political correctness or fear of offending any particular group of people does not get in the way of protecting those who are vulnerable.¹

Sources: 1. Daily Mail (U.K.), 2. The Daily Telegraph


Previous similar or related stories

Sickening Muslim child sex abuse, homosexuality, and Liberal-Left's Denialism

Libyan president who tried converting Italian girls to Islam said to have sex orgies that were copied by Italian Prime Minister

Western couple called "swine" & "infidels" during Islamic marriage renewal ceremony in Maldives [Hussein Didi made sexual insults against the couple accusing them of immorality]

UK's MI6 'intelligence' conned by impostor claiming to be Taliban's Mullah Mansour – “naive” Westerners “excited so quickly” about peace talks

Murder and dumping of Indonesian maid Kikim and torture of Sumiati in Saudi Arabia being 'deceitfully' dismissed as "very rare" cases [Kikim Komalasari binti Uko Marta, who was killed had allegedly been sexually abused]

Was race a factor in the murder of a Black man treated like a slave by the homosexual Saudi prince?

Plans to allow 'race-based' searches by the police in Britain canceled over fears of 'racial' profiling (But Islam is not a race)

  Currently the British police may stop and search, or

target suspects only on the basis of 'reasonable suspicion' they are involved in or plotting a crime.

They could not target specific groups - such as focusing on Muslims in the event of an apparent threat from Islamic extremists.

 But changes were proposed which says

while officers 'must take particular care' not to discriminate - there 'may be circumstances where it is appropriate for officers to take account of an individual's ethnic origin in selecting persons and vehicles to be stopped'.

Officers would have had to be responding to some form of intelligence, but not specific to the person involved.

 This proposal was dropped over claims that it would be discriminatory and amounts to racial profiling, and fears of abuse and breaking EU and UK laws.


Source: Daily Mail (U.K.)


Comment: It is ridiculous that Muslims can not be targeted in an event of a terrorism threat coming from within their community. This is not just with Muslims. If there was a threat from Christians then they too should be targeted as well.

 The issue of race or ethnicity, and religion also needs to be separated. Islam is neither a race nor an ethnicity. Terrorists come from all races and other backgrounds.

 Profiling also need not be based solely on race as Brigitte Gabriel argued, citing it's use in Israel. 

 And non-Muslims, such as Juan Williams, who is Black and has written books on the civil rights movement in the U.S., recognized this, and paid for it by being sacked from NPR by the PC censors.

 The PC elites appear not to want to name the Islamic threat and so are deliberately confusing it with race, to the advantage of terror supporters using the race card.

 Watch this space. When the next terrorist atrocity happens, they may regret it, or not, and say it shows the need to be even more PC, like the Dodos.


Similar or related stories:

Israeli style passenger profiling would make airlines safer than the new TSA checks, says terrorism expert Brigitte Gabriel

The law is an ass: Somali pirate boat captured and blown up but pirates released unpunished

Muslim censorship: Journalist Juan Williams fired for expressing worry of Muslims on planes

Israeli style passenger profiling would make airlines safer than the new TSA checks, says terrorism expert Brigitte Gabriel

 Brigitte Gabriel, founder of anti-Islamic terror group ACT! for America, said the U.S. should "throw political correctness in the garbage" and start profiling airline passengers, citing it's success in Israel. 

  She said al-Qaida was working on implanting explosives into women's breasts and that the new Transportation Security Administration (TSA) checks that includes full-body scanning and pat-downs, would not be very effective against such methods.

 She said the Israeli style profiling in contrast,

"can pinpoint a potential terrorist whether they are dark-skinned and named Mohammed or they are six-foot-tall, blue-eyed, blonde holders of American passports."

 She urged the public to demand

public officials to come up with ways to identity the threats by name  [emphasis added]

 She criticized Obama for excluding official references to words such as "Islamic terrorist," "jihad" and "Islamic radicals" in Government speeches.


Source: World Net Daily